Grains

Wildfire Aid Amendment Added to Farm Bill Proposal

Wildfires have been burning across Oklahoma for more than a week and in other areas of the High Plains similar to the past few years. In an effort to give better aid to wildfire victims Rep. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) proposed an amendment in the House Ag Committee proposed 2018 Farm Bill that passed committee on April 18. "As we watch wildfires again burn across Kansas and Oklahoma this week, it brings back unfortunate memories of the large fires we experienced just over a year ago that many producers are still rebuilding from. While the USDA's response to help producers recover has been good, it is important that we take time to also identify ways to improve for future disasters," Marshall says. Since April 12, the Rhea Fire and the 34 Complex Fire have burned more than 350,000 acres in northwest Oklahoma. Kansas, Texas, New Mexico and Colorado have also been dealing with several smaller wildfires in the past few weeks. The amendment is supposed to streamline the application and approval process for producers to receive resources sooner when utilizing the Emergency Conservation Program (ECP) to rebuild destroyed fences. It also simplifies the administration of the program for Farm Service Agency (FSA) employees. This change would allow victims of future disasters to receive 75 percent of the "total allowable cost" after a fence has been destroyed in a qualifying disaster. This amendment was based on an ECP improvement bill crafted by Rep. Marshall and Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). "I've met with wildfire victims, county, state and national USDA staff, and producer organizations. Together we discussed the challenges from every level, and this amendment helps all involved in the recovery process," Marshall said. There are no guarantees that the amendment will stay on the 2018 Farm Bill as it now has to go through Congress and the Senate Ag Committee also needs to pass a bill before it goes to the Senate floor.
Read more...

U.S. Sorghum Producers Hit With 178.6% In Bonds

The National Sorghum Producers (NSP) is expressing their disappointment after the Chinese government imposed what amounts to a tariff on U.S. sorghum imports. A preliminary ruling by China's Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) says U.S. sorghum was being sold at improperly low prices, which hurt Chinese farmers. In a statement released on Tuesday, NSP said they are "deeply disappointed" by China's MOFCOM decision. "National Sorghum Producers, alongside our producers, stakeholders, and partners, has cooperated fully with China's antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, including submitting several thousand pages of data demonstrating conclusively that U.S. sorghum is neither dumped nor causing any injury to China," read the statement. China, one of the biggest foreign markets for U.S. sorghum growers, is offering importers of U.S. sorghum to post bonds of 178.6 percent of the value of their goods to cover possible anti-dumping duties while the probe is completed. "None of this information appears to have been seriously considered or used in today's preliminary determination, which is neither fair nor appropriate," the statement said. In February, China began its investigation, with some calling it a warning shot after President Donald Trump increased tariffs on Chinese-made washing machines and solar modules. Justin Knopf, a sorghum producer in Salina, Kansas, reacts to the tension around trade is impacting prices on AgDay above.
Read more...

The Severe Implications of Soybean Tariffs

The proposed 25% tariff on U.S. soybean imports to China has the potential to send shockwaves through the domestic and global soybean markets. If the tariff is approved and in place for several years, U.S. farmers could be driven to reduce soybean acres, while South American farmers expand. That's according to a recent Rabobank article, “Implications of a Potential Additional 25% Duty on U.S. Soybean Imports into China - Winning and Losing Regions Beyond the U.S. and China," written by Stefan Vogel, head of agri commodity markets and global strategies for grains and oilseeds, Rabobank, and Lief Chiang, analyst, Rabobank. "A 25% duty on U.S. soybeans is not yet a given, but the implications would be severe," write Vogel and Chiang. "The current trade imbalance is considerably in China's favor." That's because China's exports to the U.S. are valued at $505 billion per year"”nearly four times the $130 billion in U.S. exports to China. If all proposed duties took effect, 40% of the U.S. exports to China would be affected, but only 10% of China's exports to the U.S., according to Rabobank research. Here's a timeline, provided by Rabobank, on how we arrived at this critical crossroads: March 22: U.S. imposes duties on Chinese products, including 25% on steel. March 23: China threatens to impose up to 25% duty on 128 U.S. products, including pork. April 3: U.S. threatens to impose 25% duties on 1,300 Chinese products, worth about $50 billion in imports. April 4: China threatens to impose an additional 25% duty on 106 U.S. products that are worth $50 billon. This includes soybeans, cotton, sorghum, wheat, beef and corn. China said it seeks a truce but would retaliate if the U.S. followed through on its proposal and that the timing will depend on the U.S. decision, which is expected in six to eight weeks. China imports 90% of its soybean needs. Around 34% of China's soybean imports come from the U.S., which represents a $14 billion market for U.S. farmers. However, the value of U.S. grain and oilseed exports to China have fallen about 15% since 2014, and last year's soybean shipments to China were the second-lowest since 2012, Rabobank reports. "Yet, supplying China solely with soybeans from countries other than the U.S. won't be easy," Vogel and Chiang point out. "In 2018, Brazil has limited room to increase soybean exports significantly, while Argentina's crop is drought-reduced and Argentina typically exports soy meal rather than soybeans." China Imports of Global Soybeans China: An additional 25% duty on U.S. soybeans will increase China's domestic soybean prices and thus also the prices of soy oil and soymeal, Rabobank reports. Chinese crushers cannot fully pass on the inflated costs downstream. As a result, higher soymeal prices will lift the production costs of livestock farming, further squeezing margins, which incentivizes changes to feed formulas to lower soymeal usage. U.S.: For the U.S., a 25% tariff will likely mean soybean prices will fall, to compensate for the extra cost to enter the world's number one importer. Therefore, U.S. soybean acreage would decline in the coming years, while corn rises, Rabobank reports. South America: A tariff on U.S. soybean imports into China will mean South American soybean exports to China will rise considerably boosting prices. South American pork and poultry margins will suffer from higher feed costs, but pork exports might benefit from Chinese duties on U.S. pork, Rabobank reports. As a result, South American famers will expand soybean acres. At the Farm Gate If this tariff goes through, it would result in a significant deterioration in cash flow for U.S. farmers, according to recent analysis from the University of Illinois and Ohio State University. (See the farmdoc daily piece, Impacts of Chinese Soybean Tariffs on Financial Position of Central Illinois Grain Farms," written by Krista Swanson, Gary Schnitkey, Todd Hubbs, Jonathan Coppess, Nick Paulson and Carl Zulauf). The economists looked at the potential impacts of a 25% soybean tariff on an average central Illinois grain farm (1,700 acres, of which 11% is owned, 44% is share rented and 45% is cash rented). At the end of 2017, the farm has $3,780,000 in net worth, a 26.8% debt-to-asset ratio, a 1.79 current ratio, and a debt coverage ratio of 150.6%. They simulated this farm's performance from 2018 through 2021. Three alternatives were applied in the simulation: Lower Prices. Soybean and corn prices likely would decline as a result of the imposition of a 25% soybean tariff. Lower Prices Plus Lower Costs. As a result of price decrease, non-land costs and cash rents likely will decrease. In addition, acreage in central Illinois and the Midwest, would switch from soybeans to corn. Farmland Price Declines. Lower commodity prices likely will lead to lower farmland returns and lower cash rents. As a result, farmland prices would decline. "The imposition of a 25% soybean tariff by China on U.S. soybean exports would result in a worsened financial and wealth position for the case farm examined," the economists report. "Cash rent declines would need to occur to offset some of the price declines. The 25% tariff would have larger negative impacts on farms with higher debt levels and higher amounts of cash rent. The reverse is true as well."
Read more...

Kansas, Oklahoma Wheat Crops Struggling to Survive

It's a struggling wheat crop in the Plains adding to the anxiety of weak prices for Kansas wheat farmers. "We've had a number of conditions on our wheat crop this year that's been difficult for it to get through," said Justin Knopf, a farmer in Saline County, Kansas. The Kansas farmer watches wheat get put to the test every year, but 2018 is pushing wheat's limits. "It's a resilient crop, but there are a lot of things outside of our control that's adding to the stress of raising a profitable crop this year," said Knopf. U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) latest crop progress report is painting a grim picture for Kansas wheat this year with 13 percent rated good to excellent, and 44 percent is considered poor to very poor. Nationally, it's the second worst crop since records began in 1986. The weather unleashed another round of possibly fatal weather last weekend, when a freeze blanketed the state. Below-freezing temperatures also hit Kansas in early April, but Knopf thinks that freeze wasn't detrimental to his crop. "Easter weekend 2007 we had snow and then freezing temperatures for about four or five nights, and we lost our entire wheat crop that year," Knopf remembered. "Our field average that year was under 10 bushels per acre." Wheat specialists are looking to determine how much damage is out there, but immaturity in central and northern Kansas is a key factor in protecting the crop from extreme cold. The freezing temperatures gripped some areas harder than others, and maturity of the crop varied. "There were parts of the state- like Hill City in northwest Kansas- where we measured five or six degrees Fahrenheit," said Romulo Lollato, Kansas State Wheat and Forages Extension Specialist. "In other parts of the state, like south central Kansas where the crop is a little bit further along than in northwest Kansas, we measured 17 to 19 Fahrenheit or so." Lollato says while the extent of the damage is still being determined, the father south you travel in the state, the further along the crop is right now. That's why he thinks the southeast portion of the state is at the highest risk of injury. "We were below that 24 [degrees] threshold for that part of the state for about six hours or so," said Lollato. "I think that can hurt"”we can see some of the primary tillers get slaughtered off in that part of the state." The bigger risk of damage may sit in Oklahoma right now, as concerned farmers cancelled new crop wheat contracts in fear that a portion of the crop is lost. "One percent of Oklahoma was headed already, more of it was in the boot stage where we'd look at 24 degrees for two hours as being a critical temperature," said Suderman. "Temperatures dropped down in the low 20s in many of those areas of Oklahoma, so we believe there was quite a bit of damage in Oklahoma." Oklahoma State's small grains specialist David Marburger says scars are starting to show up. "We are starting now to see some injury symptoms, such as leaf tip burning," he said. He says it's still too early for most farmers to depict the extent of damage of the recent freeze in Oklahoma. "It's the hardest thing to do, but it's best to wait a week - if it's still cool, maybe a little bit longer than a week - and then go out and assess what type of injury did we get on this crop," Marburger said. It's a delayed crop that's already struggling as drought worsens across both Oklahoma and Kansas. The latest U.S. drought monitor shows while 58 percent of Oklahoma is seeing drought, exceptional drought now covers 18 percent of the state. In Kansas, more than 97 percent is covered with dry conditions and nearly 60 percent is considered severe or worse. Knopf hasn't seen rain since fall. "After those rains finished in October, it stopped raining ever since," he said. "We've had the driest winter on record for much of Kansas." It's that disappointing story playing out for wheat growers across the plains. "The drought has still taken away a lot of the yield potential, and that's going to hurt the crops ability to come back from this spring freeze damage," said Suderman. "We're going to be in a real dicey situation as we head into warmer temperatures - we're going to use up that small amount of soil moisture we have at the surface pretty rapidly," said Knopf. "The ongoing drought is real significant as we move further into spring." If rains swept the state today, Lollato says some of the state's crop has already been damaged enough that moisture would save the crop. "If we have some rain soon, we can still have a decent crop, but in parts of the state - like southwest Kansas"”I believe we already hurt our yield potential," he said. It's that potential also lost in parts of Oklahoma. "You've got a third of the state that's in despicable, desperate conditions," said Kim Anderson, Oklahoma State University Grain Marketing Specialist. "They're looking at yields 10 bushels per acre." Anderson says if there's a silver lining in all of this, it's the possible protein of the wheat this year. "I think quality is more important than yield this year," said Anderson. "You're going to be paid on the bushels produced; however, if we produce a crop with relatively low protein and low test weight, we're going to have prices below $4. If we can average with high protein and test weight, we're going to have prices up around $5 to $5.25 because the market needs the wheat." However, Lollato warns that if the market is flooded with high-protein wheat, he questions if producers will actually get paid for that protein. "The last two years they were because the majority of the state had low protein, so whoever managed for that protein were getting a premium," he said. "If everyone has a high protein, may be god for the market, but not for the producers." Whether it's from yield or protein, wheat producers like Knopf say they need higher prices than what they're faced with today. "Right now we're hovering right around break even prices, going on both sides of that," he said. Suderman says the recipe for higher wheat prices would be with two key events. "One would be a problem in another major wheat producing area of the world that competes with our milling wheat here in the Plains," he said. "The other factor would be the continued strength in corn. The two feed off each other so if we have strength in corn, that could allow world wheat prices to drift higher, as well" As wheat prices struggle to reach break-even, it's starting to look like a disappointing finish to the final chapter of what's been a trying and challenging year.
Read more...

U.S. DOJ Approves Bayer, Monsanto Deal

The U.S. Department of Justice reportedly approved Bayer's acquisition of Monsanto- conditional on the sale of certain assets to secure antitrust approval, according to Wall Street Journal. This approval comes at the heels of the European Union's approval of the deal, which required several divestments, including Bayer's LibertyLink and row-crop businesses and Monsanto's NemaStrike seed treatment. BASF will acquire the LibertyLink and row crop businesses. With this approval in the books there are just a few countries left to grant approvals before the companies merge, notably Canada and Mexico. "Bayer has announced several planned divestitures. With these actions, Monsanto continues to be confident in the companies' collective ability to secure the required approvals within the second calendar quarter of 2018 and in the time contemplated by the agreement," the company said in a recent news release. The companies say the acquisition will lead to $2.63 billion annual spending on research and development, with 10,000 employees dedicated to it. If combined, the companies plan to pair the chemical, data science and seed research sides for what they say will be streamlined, simultaneous innovation. For example, instead of creating a herbicide chemistry and then waiting up to ten years for the accompanying seed technology the two could launch together, leaders from both companies have said.
Read more...

Is U.S. Beef Next On China's Tariff List?

Today, China is delivering a second blow to the trade war developing with the U.S. The country issued a $50 billion list of U.S. goods at risk for a possible tariff hike, including U.S. soybeans and beef. There's no date for the 25% increase to take effect, but producers are already worried. "It is unsettling to see American-produced beef listed as a target for retaliation," says Kent Bacus, director of international trade and market access for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. "Sadly, we are not surprised, as this is an inevitable outcome of any trade war. This is a battle between two governments, and the unfortunate casualties will be America's cattlemen and women and our consumers in China. The Trump Administration has until the end of May to resolve this issue. We believe in trade enforcement, but endless retaliation is not a good path forward for either side." This growing trade market that just restarted, could be halted quickly. "China is a promising market for U.S. beef, and, since the June 2017 reopening, the U.S. industry has made an exceptional effort to provide customers with high-quality beef at an affordable price," says Dan Halstrom, U.S. Meat Export Federation (USMEF) president and CEO. "This is not an easy task, due to our 13-year absence from the market and China's beef import requirements." Since the Chinese market reopened late in 2017, trade data from USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service has projected that China will import 2.26 billion pounds of beef in 2018. At the current level, U.S. beef exports to China would represent roughly 1% of Chinese beef imports. Producers were excited to capture even a small percentage of China's beef demand. The country imported $2.5 billion beef products in 2016. According to USMEF data, in the second half of 2017, following the market reopening, U.S. beef exports to China totaled 3,020 metric tons valued at $31 million. In January 2018, exports reached the highest monthly volume to date at 819 metric tons, valued at $7.5 million.
Read more...

Could U.S. Soybean Exports Still Hold Without China?

Following China's announcement of the proposed 25 percent tariff on U.S. soybeans, the American Soybean Association (ASA) shared its frustration over the escalation of the trade dispute with the largest customer of U.S. soy. "This is no longer a hypothetical, and a 25 percent tariff will have a devastating effect on every soybean farmer in America," said John Heisdorffer, president of ASA. “Don't say that China can't do this,” said Tom Sleight, president and CEO of the U.S. Grains Council. "They surely can and they've proven that they can. They are very creative traders. We've seen this happen in feed grains. I'm sure this can potentially happen in protein meal as well." John Payne, publisher of "This Week In Grain" says South America could potentially import soybeans from the United States if China does import more from South America. "[China] is poised to buy 100 million metric tons this next marketing year," said Payne. "If [China] goes with that number, the only way- in my opinion they can get that number out of South America is for South America to import beans from the United States."
Read more...

Disappearing Crop Acreage

USDA'S Prospective Plantings Report issued Thursday shows total acres planted to principal crops in the U.S. will total 318 million acres. That's a decline of more than 1 million acres from last year. For the first time since 1983, soybean acreage will top corn acreage. USDA projects farmers will plant 89 million acres of soybeans and 88 million acres of corn. Both of those estimates are lower than last year's acreage. "There were some crops that had some stronger returns than corn and soybeans [last year]. That starts with obviously the cotton situation in the south where we saw more acreage from last year and even in rice production in the south,” says Professor Chris Hurt, agricultural economist at Purdue University. Cotton plantings are expected to reach 13.5 million acres, up 7% from a year ago. USDA analysts expect rice plantings to reach 2.7 million acres, a 9% rise. In Arkansas, the nation's largest rice producing state, USDA expects rice acreage to grow by 170,000 acres to 1.3 million acres. "Unless rains push us extremely late, our early rice intended acres won't change much," says Jarrod Hardke, extension rice agronomist for the Division of Agriculture at the University of Arkansas. USDA is estimating all-wheat acres are up 3% from last year, pegging 47.3 million acres. Hurt sees other factors in the land battle, something he calls ‘discouraged out. "We're talking about very marginal land that producers don't believe they can even get a return that will cover their variable costs of putting seed, fertilizer and chemicals into that crop,” explained Hurt. Hurt says that move doesn't reflect a lot of acreage in the U.S., but the country has seen over the past several years a return to a long-term average of losing about a million acres from the crop base each year.
Read more...

Soybeans Key to Future Prices

USDA dropped a couple bombs on American farmers yesterday in the agency's Prospective Planting and Grain Stocks reports. These surprises lead to quick reactions from the market. "Stocks came in higher than anticipated for corn and soybeans, which unto itself give the market a bearish reaction," says Pro Farmer Editor Brian Grete. "But that was trumped by the prospective planting intentions." Corn and soybean planting intentions dropped to below what they were a year ago. Corn dropped 2% from 2017 and soybeans dropped a single percent. Picking up the slack, wheat jumped 3% over this past year and cotton soared 7% higher. "The soybean number is shockingly below what they were last year and the trade, for now based on price reaction, believes that number," Grete says. "We'll see if they believe it moving forward which will be the key to spring price reaction in the corn and soybean markets." Prospective planting acreage estimates are as follows: Corn-88 million acres Soybeans-89 million acres All Wheat-47.3 million acres All cotton 13.5 million acres Sorghum-5.9 million acres Grain Stock report key findings: Corn stocks up 3% from March 2017 Soybean stocks up 21% All wheat stocks down 10% Grain sorghum down 23%
Read more...

Sorghum Acres Will Climb In 2018

Sorghum demand and basis are strong, and many farmers are considering planting more of the crop in 2018. The United Sorghum Checkoff Program (USCP) expects a total of 6.7 million acres, an increase of 1 million acres—a 17% hike—from 2017 levels. “Sorghum recently hit the 1 billion bushel mark in exports to China,” says Brent Bean, USCP agronomist. “The export market has remained strong for the past two to three years. We expect the mid-South and even mid-Atlantic states to grow more sorghum this year.” If you’re planting sorghum for the first time or for the first time in years, consider the agronomic advantages and disadvantages compared with corn and soybeans. “The biggest difference in production costs between corn and sorghum is seed,” says Kraig Roozeboom, Kansas State University agronomist. “Even when gross returns on sorghum might be less, input costs are dramatically reduced.” Sorghum costs from $7.50 to $14 per acre depending on seeding rate, while corn is typically around $100 per acre for seed. Depending on how early you plant sorghum, its ability to tiller (unlike corn or soybeans) could make up for lower seeding rates or poor emergence. “Sorghum needs 55°F to 60°F soil temperature, similar to soybean planting time,” Roozeboom says. “It will tiller more when planted early in cooler soils and less when planted later in warm soils. It can be planted as late as June depending on frost.” Sorghum provides additional advantages beyond input savings, according to Bean. These include: Tillering allows it to compensate for poor initial stands or skips and to provide for higher yield when weather conditions are good. It’s more drought tolerant than many other crops and responds well to water. Sorghum works great in rotation with other crops—cotton, soybean and corn yields have all been shown to be higher when following sorghum. Stalks make for excellent grazing for cattle or as residue for ground cover after harvest. Watch for weed and insect pests and don’t ignore plant nutrition. Sorghum is not Roundup Ready and has limitations on herbicide application. In addition, sugarcane aphid is an especially tricky pest with which corn and soybean farmers are unfamiliar. Select hybrids that display sugarcane aphid resistance and be sure to scout for the pest. Bean says farmers need to plan weed control in advance. “You have to use an effective pre-emergent with residual since post options are far fewer than corn and soybeans.” You’ll have options for hard-to-control broadleaves such as waterhemp and Palmer amaranth, he adds, but grasses could prove tricky because the herbicides that kill grasses kill sorghum. If you can protect fields from weeds until they reach canopy, you’ll be in good shape, which is one reason some experts recommend narrower rows. “If you can go with narrow rows, say 15" or use a drill, there is a lot of data that says you have the opportunity to capture more yield provided you have adequate rainfall,” Roozeboom explains. “Narrow rows tend to close the canopy sooner and potentially suppress weeds better than wider row spacing.” Take into account sorghum does have fertility needs. “We recommend 1.2 lb. per bushel for nitrogen, the same recommendation as corn,” Bean says. “The difference is in yield, where corn might yield 200 bu. per acre sorghum is probably more like 160 bu. per acre in the same field, so the overall need for nitrogen is less.” If you’re on new ground or unsure of your nutrient levels, take a soil test to make sure you’re not over- or underapplying nutrients. Get the most out of sorghum by taking advantage of its strengths while compensating for weaknesses.
Read more...